Workload fit
Review application dependencies, performance needs, data gravity, licensing, latency, and migration complexity before deciding what should move.
Cloud computing services
Plan, migrate, and manage cloud environments with attention to application fit, security controls, reliability, and cost visibility. The right approach depends on your existing systems, constraints, and operating model.
Illustrative model. Actual components depend on the chosen provider and workload requirements.
Start with the decision
Cloud adoption is an architecture and operating decision as much as a hosting decision. Begin with the constraints that shape a workable design.
Review application dependencies, performance needs, data gravity, licensing, latency, and migration complexity before deciding what should move.
Clarify who owns identity, network changes, deployments, monitoring, incident response, backups, and ongoing platform administration.
Consider resilience targets, recovery requirements, data location, access control, usage patterns, support costs, and the risk of provider-specific dependencies.
Service areas
Scope can be limited to a defined assessment or extended to implementation and operational support. Activities and deliverables are agreed against the environment and engagement requirements.
Establish the current state, identify constraints, compare target-state options, and prioritize feasible next steps.
Plan workload movement while accounting for cutover risk, application dependencies, data transfer, and rollback needs.
Design foundational components to fit workload needs, access boundaries, resilience objectives, and operational ownership.
Assess managed platforms and deployment patterns against application architecture and team operating capabilities.
Translate security and governance requirements into practical controls, ownership, and review points.
Improve visibility into resource use and establish operational practices that reflect actual demand and service criticality.
Service models
The service model changes the division of responsibility between the cloud provider and your organization. Exact responsibilities depend on the product and configuration.
Use virtual compute, storage, and networking resources while retaining substantial responsibility for operating systems, applications, configuration, and data.
Consider when: you need infrastructure flexibility or must retain control over more of the software stack.
Use a managed application or data platform to reduce the amount of underlying infrastructure your team operates.
Consider when: the application fits the service constraints and the team prefers to focus on code and configuration.
Consume a provider-operated application, with configuration, access, data handling, integration, and subscription choices remaining important.
Consider when: a suitable application can meet the business need without building and running the full stack.
Deployment patterns
A design should follow workload, governance, team, and commercial requirements—not the assumption that one deployment pattern is always best.
Provider-operated infrastructure with access to a broad range of managed services and elastic capacity.
Cloud-style resource management in an environment dedicated to one organization.
Connected on-premises and cloud environments where workloads remain across more than one location.
Use of services from more than one public cloud provider for specific architectural or business reasons.
Delivery approach
The sequence below is a planning framework, not a promise of a fixed timeline. The required depth at each stage depends on scope, dependencies, and risk.
Review workloads, interfaces, data flows, operational constraints, and desired outcomes.
Typical output: current-state findings and open questionsCompare target patterns, migration options, priorities, risks, and indicative cost drivers.
Typical output: options and a scoped recommendationEstablish required foundations, identity and network controls, environments, ownership, and migration prerequisites.
Typical output: readiness actions and cutover planMove agreed workloads in controlled stages, validate functionality and data, and define rollback criteria before cutover.
Typical output: validation evidence for the agreed scopeReview monitoring, access, backups, recovery, usage, and cost allocation; assign ongoing responsibilities.
Typical output: operational actions and ownershipOperational guardrails
These areas should be designed and reviewed in context. Cloud adoption does not automatically deliver security, availability, regulatory compliance, or lower expenditure.
Define who can access each environment, how privileged access is controlled, how secrets and keys are managed, and what data requires protection or residency review.
Set service availability and recovery objectives, identify dependencies, test backup restoration, and validate failover assumptions rather than relying on backup configuration alone.
Decide which metrics, logs, traces, alerts, and audit records are needed, who reviews them, and how incidents are escalated and resolved.
Include compute, storage, data transfer, licenses, support, backup, redundancy, and idle resources in cost reviews. Estimates depend on usage assumptions and the chosen design.
Common questions
A sound plan makes assumptions and dependencies visible early, before implementation choices become difficult to reverse.
No. Some workloads may be better retained, replaced, re-architected, or delayed. The decision depends on technical dependencies, licensing, latency, data requirements, security obligations, supportability, and economics.
Compare service fit, existing skills, integration requirements, data-location constraints, resilience options, pricing, contractual terms, and dependence on provider-specific services. A provider should be selected against stated requirements rather than assumed preference.
Not automatically. Costs depend on workload utilization, architecture, licensing, data transfer, support, resilience design, and the effort needed to operate the environment. A useful estimate states its assumptions and should be revisited against observed usage.
No. Responsibilities are shared and vary by service model. The provider secures parts of the underlying service, while customers typically retain responsibilities for areas such as identities, access, data, configuration, and application security.
A high-level workload list, current hosting arrangement, key application dependencies, data sensitivity, availability and recovery needs, known constraints, and the business reason for considering cloud are useful starting points. Sensitive credentials or production data are not needed for an initial scope discussion.
Next step
Share the business objective, current environment, and constraints you need to work within. The next step is to clarify scope, information needs, and whether an assessment, migration plan, or operational review is the appropriate starting point.